From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 03/13/03
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 12:54, Sandro Hawke wrote: > here's a draft. it's kind of weak on actual use-case, but maybe it's > enough of a start. TimBL recently wrote a page on this sort of thing: Tutorial: Reaching out onto the Web http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Reach.html esp. Looking inside web resources: log:semantics and log:includes Implementing defaults and log:notIncludes Getting results from the web: log:definitiveService and log:definitiveDocument > -- sandro > > -- > > 2.x Rules About Web Content > > Documents available on the web can be important inputs into custom > reasoning involving rules. Certain conclusions can be drawn when > the document retreived from some URI says certain things, does _not_ > say certain things, is signed by a certain signature, was last > modified at a certain date, etc. For example: > > * http://www.w3.org/TR/ gives the official list of W3C publications > and their normative status. A form of this in RDF could be > useful input to rules about whether a given document was > normative. This involves negatation-as-failure in an explicitely > closed world: anything not listed on that page cannot be a W3C > recommendation. This is not theoretical; it's working in practice. http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/ Hmm... it doesn't seem to use log:notIncludes though. It's supposed to, eventually. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 03/13/03 EST