Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 02/22/01

Next message: Mike Dean: "daml+oil+dt examples, etc."
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
[...]
> > --        Using XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and DAML+OIL
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/01/ct24
[...]

> A fully-worked out set of examples would be illustrative.  They would be
> helpful as we wrestle with a better version of the datatype spec that might
> relax some of the restrictions in the current proposal.

Quite. I'll see what I can do.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org
  (put return phone number in from/subject)

Next message: Mike Dean: "daml+oil+dt examples, etc."
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST