Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 02/22/01

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
Next in thread: Jeff Heflin: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I would like for one the points that are brought up at the RDF meeting
> next week to be that XML namespaces can be used in resource names.  It is
> exceedingly silly to state a bunch of namespace definitions only to have to
> revert to the long name in most places.

Quite. Technically, this is a no-brainer.

Organizationally, there's a question of whether to spend
effort more on figuring out what we meant by the existing
syntax or refining it here and there.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org
  (put return phone number in from/subject)

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
Next in thread: Jeff Heflin: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST