From: Frank van Harmelen (Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl)
Date: 10/31/01
Jeff wrote: > > 2) The Person class has a restriction stating the a person can have only > > one FullTimeOccupation, but FullTimeOccupation is not defined in the > > ontology. The FullTimeOccupation class should be added to the ontology. Peter answered: > It probably should be, but it is not strictly necessary, as its position in a > restriction makes it an rdf:Class. We've discussed this a few times in the past. It was then considered a deliberate feature of the example to show that DAML+OIL allows the usage of (e.g.) classes before they are "defined", or even when they are not "defined" at all (particularly in a Web context). I still consider this a feature of the example, not a bug. Frank. ----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST