a few tricks [was: DAML+OIL Expressivity Question]

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 11/13/01

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Fw: Re: revised DAML+OIL submission to W3C"
Previous message: Harold Boley: "Re: Query Language Issues"
In reply to: Deborah McGuinness: "Re: DAML+OIL Expressivity Question"
Next in thread: Graham Klyne: "Re: DAML+OIL Expressivity Question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Deborah McGuinness wrote:
> 
> sorry for the multiple emails.
> In order to make this suggestion more operational, I have put up a web page at:
> http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/daml/modelingIssues.html
> 
> If you provide html in that format, your input will be included more quickly.

it's not in the right format, but pls consider:

  a recipie for ont:UnambiguousProperty, rdfs:isDefinedBy
  From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
  Date: 05/16/01 
  http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0418.html

and the following
  http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0419.html


Another trick that I find myself looking up now and again:

  Re: enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent
  Ian Horrocks (05/16/01) 
  http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0420.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Fw: Re: revised DAML+OIL submission to W3C"
Previous message: Harold Boley: "Re: Query Language Issues"
In reply to: Deborah McGuinness: "Re: DAML+OIL Expressivity Question"
Next in thread: Graham Klyne: "Re: DAML+OIL Expressivity Question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST