From: Graham Klyne ([email protected])
Date: 11/12/01
As one who relatively recently became aware of description logics, I found
that a very useful, readable paper. Thanks for that. I think it deserves
wider awareness outside this community.
(It has seemed to me that relatively few of the papers that deal with
description logics are available online. I have been unable to get hold of
some that were suggested to me, such as past ICCS proceedings. Has anyone
yet written a textbook on description logics?)
#g
--
At 09:08 AM 11/8/01 -0800, Deborah McGuinness wrote:
>That was for a mostly less expressive language than daml+oil (although
>interestingly
>enough would have happily been able to say the thing that jeff wanted to
>say since
>it did have same-as as a constructor).
>
>[1]
>http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/living-with-classic-abstract.html
-------------------------
__
/\ \ Graham Klyne
/ \ \ ([email protected])
/ /\ \ \
/ / /\ \ \
/ / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST