From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 03/03/01
re the 20Feb minutes, I'm not listed as a participant, but discussion is attributed to me. I believe I was there ;-) http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2001-02-20.html v 1.5 2001/02/28 03:54:27 Those minutes say "Since Mike was late getting them out, we'll review the minutes from 6 February 2001 next week. " but the 27Feb minutes don't record any such review. I just looked at the 6Feb minutes, and they're fine by me. http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2001-02-06.html v 1.6 2001/02/28 03:54:27 > The minutes from this week's telecon have been posted to > [1]. > [1] http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2001-02-27.html v 1.5 2001/03/03 08:01:43 I wasn't there, but those minutes look interesting and useful; i.e. they're fine by me. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST