From: Sandro Hawke ([email protected])
Date: 11/17/05
> Ora Lassila said the following:
> > I have the same concerns, plus I worry that the more levels/layers/variants
> > we create, the more confusing this gets for most people (incompatibilities
> > or no incompatibilities).
>
> I remember well the uphill battle we had to convince the W3C staff
> (including Tim) that we wanted different flavours of OWL (well, some of
> us, anyway:-). I would be surprised if they were now open to a whole
> stack of rule-language varieties?
It should be interesting to see how this all gets worked out in Phase
2 of the RIFWG. We should be able to avoid these questions for Phase
1, though.
-- sandro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/17/05 EST