From: Sandro Hawke ([email protected])
Date: 11/17/05
> Ora Lassila said the following: > > I have the same concerns, plus I worry that the more levels/layers/variants > > we create, the more confusing this gets for most people (incompatibilities > > or no incompatibilities). > > I remember well the uphill battle we had to convince the W3C staff > (including Tim) that we wanted different flavours of OWL (well, some of > us, anyway:-). I would be surprised if they were now open to a whole > stack of rule-language varieties? It should be interesting to see how this all gets worked out in Phase 2 of the RIFWG. We should be able to avoid these questions for Phase 1, though. -- sandro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/17/05 EST