Re: SWRL levels

From: Frank van Harmelen ([email protected])
Date: 11/16/05

Next message: monmon: "$B!y%M%C%H;:6H$K$*$1$kD4::$H%"%s%1!<%H$N$*4j$$(B"

Previous message: Ora Lassila: "Re: SWRL levels"
In reply to: Ora Lassila: "Re: SWRL levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ora Lassila said the following:
> I have the same concerns, plus I worry that the more levels/layers/variants
> we create, the more confusing this gets for most people (incompatibilities
> or no incompatibilities).

I remember well the uphill battle we had to convince the W3C staff 
(including Tim) that we wanted different flavours of OWL (well, some of 
us, anyway:-). I would be surprised if they were now open to a whole 
stack of rule-language varieties?

Frank.
   --

Next message: monmon: "$B!y%M%C%H;:6H$K$*$1$kD4::$H%"%s%1!<%H$N$*4j$$(B"
Previous message: Ora Lassila: "Re: SWRL levels"
In reply to: Ora Lassila: "Re: SWRL levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/16/05 EST