more thoughts on evolution of Rules Lite syntax

From: Benjamin Grosof ([email protected])
Date: 09/30/03

Next message: Mike Dean: "warning label"

Previous message: Benjamin Grosof: "expressiveness and evolution issues for Rules Lite, some implications for syntax too"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi folks,
Here are some thoughts on evolution of Rules Lite syntax.

In the near term (for DAML meeting), we should focus on abstract syntax and 
human-oriented string syntax.
Ideally, we will later have an RDF syntax specification, with associated 
RDF-XML encoding into XML.
In the meantime, we can have one or multiple draft XML syntaxes, with one 
aim being to facilitate development and use of tools,
including tools for OWL and for RuleML and commercial rule (and ontology) 
systems.
We shouldn't expect to nail down this syntax for Rules Lite until we take a 
semi-serious stab at extensibility to Situated Courteous Logic Programs as 
well, as a sanity check.

Benjamin

________________________________________________________________________________________________
Prof. Benjamin Grosof
Web Technologies for E-Commerce, Business Policies, E-Contracting, Rules, 
XML, Agents, Semantic Web Services
MIT Sloan School of Management, Information Technology group
http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof or http://www.mit.edu/~bgrosof

Next message: Mike Dean: "warning label"
Previous message: Benjamin Grosof: "expressiveness and evolution issues for Rules Lite, some implications for syntax too"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 09/30/03 EST