Re: updated Requirements

• Previous message: Deborah L. McGuinness: "Re: Joint Committee telecon today 29 July"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Dean: "updated Requirements"
• Next in thread: Harold Boley: "Re: updated Requirements"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi Mike,

I agree the discussion you brought up on binary vs. n-ary relations is important.
To better understand some of the issues I went back to your rule test cases email
(http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/1389.html).

Since you expect the most common uses will be like property chaining and translation
I used these for the use case comparison below.

Talk to you soon,
Harold


Basic property chaining (relational product)
============================================

N3
~
:mike :parent :joe.
:joe :brother :leon.

{ ?child :parent ?p.
  ?p :brother ?u. }
=>
{ ?child :uncle ?u }.

{ :mike :uncle :leon }
=>
{ <> test:successful "true" }

• Next message: Harold Boley: "Re: updated Requirements"
• Previous message: Deborah L. McGuinness: "Re: Joint Committee telecon today 29 July"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Dean: "updated Requirements"
• Next in thread: Harold Boley: "Re: updated Requirements"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 07/29/03 EST