Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 10/18/01

Deborah McGuinness wrote:
> on the [party] below - does that mean that I sign it as an individual?
>  AS WELL AS asking someone at stanford to sign it as "member company"?

Stanford's not a member, are they? Oops.. yes, they are, I see.

Anyway... they're only relevant if they have/own rights in DAML+OIL,
or if they want to be one of the submitting organizations
along with lucent.

Is your work on DAML+OIL your own? or does it belong to stanford?
or maybe to DARPA?

Dan Connolly, W3C

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST