From: Deborah McGuinness ([email protected])
Date: 10/18/01
on the [party] below - does that mean that I sign it as an individual? AS WELL AS asking someone at stanford to sign it as "member company"? thx, d "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > From: Jim Hendler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:12:51 -0400 > > > > > > > > > >(2) we need more explicit copyright license terms. > > > > > >I suggest that you ammend the submission request > > >to include the following text, substituting > > >each of the authors for [party]: > > > > > > [party] hereby grants to the W3C, a perpetual, > > > nonexclusive, royalty-free, world-wide right and license under any > > > [party] copyrights in this contribution to copy, publish and > > > distribute the contribution, as well as a right and license of the > > > same scope to any derivative works prepared by the W3C and based on, > > > or incorporating all or part of the contribution. [Member Company] > > > further agrees that any derivative works of this contribution prepared > > > by the W3C shall be solely owned by the W3C. > > > > How about: > > > > [party} hereby grants to all organizations and entities a perpetual, > > royalty-free... ? > > > > i.e. let's just put the frigging thing in public domain -- can W3C handle > that? > > No idea. > > peter -- Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: [email protected] URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST