From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 08/29/01
I may have been mistaken about this. (I was going by my remembrance of
what Pat said, and by what is in his model theory document.)
peter
From: Dan Connolly <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:46:22 -0500
> "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> >
> > Here are some thoughts on rdfs:subClassOf.
> >
> > peter
> >
> > Notes on the new definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> >
> > The RDF Core working group has modified the definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> > to indicate that rdfs:subClassOf means proper subclass.
>
> I don't believe that's actually the case. I'm certainly
> not party to any such decision.
>
> Have you guys seen any record of this decision?
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST