Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 08/29/01


"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 
> Here are some thoughts on rdfs:subClassOf.
> 
> peter
> 
>         Notes on the new definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> 
> The RDF Core working group has modified the definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> to indicate that rdfs:subClassOf means proper subclass.

I don't believe that's actually the case. I'm certainly
not party to any such decision.

Have you guys seen any record of this decision?



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST