From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 08/29/01
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > > Here are some thoughts on rdfs:subClassOf. > > peter > > Notes on the new definition of rdfs:subClassOf > > The RDF Core working group has modified the definition of rdfs:subClassOf > to indicate that rdfs:subClassOf means proper subclass. I don't believe that's actually the case. I'm certainly not party to any such decision. Have you guys seen any record of this decision? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST