From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 07/18/01
This is a nice message from Brian. We now bounce non-member submissions to joint-committee as a spam filter. Mike ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: majordomo-owner Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:47:32 +0100 From: Brian McBride <[email protected]> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank van Harmelen <[email protected]> CC: Dan Brickley <[email protected]>, [email protected], rdf core <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL References: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frank, At its teleconference on Friday 13th July 2001, the RDFCore working group formally acknowledged receipt of this document. The preliminary minutes of this meeting can be found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jul/0148.html We have taken an action to assess the contents of this document and to give a first response by the end of this month (July 2001). Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair Frank van Harmelen wrote: > > Dan, Brian, > > As you know, DAML+OIL is built on top of RDF/RDF Schema. Now that the > RDF Core Working Group has started its activities, the "joint committee" > who has designed DAML+OIL has written a document that describes which > areas of RDF and RDF Schema need attention based on our experiences with > defining DAML+OIL as an extension of RDF Schema. We present the document > to the RDF Core WG as input for your activities. > > You can find the document at > http://www.daml.org/2001/07/RDFS-DAML+OIL-coordination.html > > We hope you will find this material useful input to the RDF Core WG. > This is a public document, so feel free to distribute it inside and/or > outside the RDF Core WG, as you see fit. > > On behalf of the "joint committee for DAML+OIL", > > Frank van Harmelen. > ---- > [email protected] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh > Department of AI, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > de Boelelaan 1081a, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands > tel (+31)-20-444 7731 fax&voicemail (+31)-84-8722806 > > -------- > > Abstract: > > This document describes which areas of RDF and RDF Schema need attention > based on our experiences with defining DAML+OIL as an extension of RDF > Schema. It is input from the DAML+OIL Joint Committee to the RDF Core > working group. > > Contents: > > what does DAML+OIL depend on from RDF(S) > RDF triple structure > RDF Schema constructions > what does DAML+OIL not use at all > reification > containers > meta-classes > what changes does DAML+OIL require in RDF(S) > multiple domains with intersection semantics > multiple ranges with intersection semantics > cycles in subclass- and subproperty-hierarchies > what areas of RDF(S) problematic > syntax > normalisation > datatypes > scoping > layering > Syntax of URIs: > Semantics of URIs: ------- End of Forwarded Message
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST