Re: [on the value of RDF]

From: Stefan Decker ([email protected])
Date: 01/10/01

• Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Previous message: Stefan Decker: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Next in thread: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Reply: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

BTW: Is it worthwhile to repeat the recent discussion (in fast mode, 
resending the
emails) in rdf-interest or rdf-logic?

CU,
	Stefan

• Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Previous message: Stefan Decker: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Maybe in reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Next in thread: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Reply: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST