Re: about vs. ID

From: Frank van Harmelen ([email protected])
Date: 01/07/01

Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: about vs. ID"
Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: (Part 2) Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: about vs. ID"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: about vs. ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dan Connolly wrote:

> I think perhaps ID="..." is conventional, but it's perhaps
> a convention we should discourage.

Here's the relevant quote from the RDF M&S document
(http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#basicSyntax)

> The Description element names, in an about attribute, 
> the resource to which each of the statements apply. 
> If the resource does not yet exist 
> (i.e., does not yet have a resource identifier) 
> then a Description element can supply the identifer for the resource
> using an ID attribute.

and

> The ID attribute signals the creation of a new resource and the
> about attribute refers to an existing resource; 

So, this seems to explicitly suggest the "convention we should discourage".
Dan, does this change your mind? (It doesn't change mine).
Ora? (you wrote this stuff!:-)

Frank.
   ----

Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: about vs. ID"
Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: (Part 2) Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: about vs. ID"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: about vs. ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST