Re: Where did these syntax constraints come from?

From: Jim Hendler ([email protected])
Date: 01/04/01

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: Rules for restrictions"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I also wondered about:

>An Ontology element contains version information and one or more 
>imports elements.

I assume this is trying to say we must include some particular one 
(daml+oil) or one that includes that or something - but it seems odd 
to me that I MUST import something - did I miss this?

  -JH





Dr. James Hendler		[email protected]
Chief Scientist, DARPA/ISO	703-696-2238 (phone)
3701 N. Fairfax Dr.		703-696-2201 (Fax)
Arlington, VA 22203		http://www.cs.umd.edu/~hendler

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: Rules for restrictions"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST