Lynn brought up some questions she had about the W3C collaborator's agreement for invited experts.
rdfs:comment
and rdf:Property
.
Peter has updated
the
draft submission
and Mike will mirror the changes on www.daml.org.
There was some discussion about whether
daml:ObjectProperty
should be used instead.
The Validator is designed to help debug typos and similar errors during the creation of DAML+OIL content. Unlike XML validation, it's intended to point out possible problems rather than hard errors.
The Validator effectively creates a closed world over a set of specified DAML inputs.
We need to be careful in using the Validator "conclusions". There was general concensus that results such as "http://xxx#Dogg is not defined as a Class on the page at http://xxx" were helpful and appropriate, but don't constitute an error (though Jeff thought such undefined classes should be an error). The Validator allows users to adjust the levels associated with its indications.
Deb referred folks to the Knowledge Base Diagnostics site that she and Adam Pease developed for the DARPA Rapid Knowledge Formation program.
The Japanese government is very interested in the Semantic Web and are looking for success stories (he cited dmoz.org). They want to generate RDF from HTML and are looking for a killer app (e.g. matching job applicants to jobs).
At a recent INTEP Semantic Web Conference, Stuart Weibel gave a talk on Dublin Core.
We'll continue our query discussion, based on Richard's issues list.
$Id: 2001-11-06.html,v 1.9 2001/11/26 21:29:43 mdean Exp $