From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 11/15/05
It occurred to me that the "two towers" (ontologies and rules) may share many floors and that many users may prefer to stay within the common base (for fear of heights or other reasons). I think this is the focus of [1] from Tim's ISWC2005 keynote. To help with this, I think it may be useful to identify additional levels of SWRL and offer the following starting definitions: SWRL RDF individualPropertyAtom and datavaluedPropertyAtom (property is just rdf:Property), builtinAtom SWRL RDFS classAtom (named classes only), datarangeAtom, individualPropertyAtom, datavaluedPropertyAtom, builtinAtom SWRL DLP current SWRL Member Submission restricted to DLP limitations SWRL Lite current SWRL Member Submission restricted to OWL Lite limitations SWRL DL current SWRL Member Submission (OWL DL semantics) SWRL Full current SWRL Member Submission with OWL Full semantics SWRL FOL current SWRL FOL Member Submission SWRL RDF, SWRL RDFS, and SWRL DLP are in the common base. Thoughts? Mike [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/1110-iswc-tbl/#[12]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/15/05 EST