Re: status of SWRL FOL

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 02/17/05

Next message: Shannon Stern: "High rates? Not with us! 3.25 fixed"

Previous message: Sandro Hawke: "Re: status of SWRL FOL"
In reply to: Sandro Hawke: "Re: status of SWRL FOL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Not a serious problem.  I was just asking because the final report on my
DAML activities is due soon, and I was trying to see what I could put on
it.  :-)

peter


From: Sandro Hawke <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: status of SWRL FOL 
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:46:05 -0500

> > Has SWRL FOL been officially accepted by W3C?
> 
> No, I'm critical path for it, and I put the workshop as a higher
> priority.  And I'm on vacation now.  I should get to it Monday, but
> the other elements may not be able to be completed before the
> TechPlenary moratorium.  I'm sorry if this turns out to be a problem;
> I've had some unexpected personal demands on my time recently.
> 
>     -- sandro

Next message: Shannon Stern: "High rates? Not with us! 3.25 fixed"
Previous message: Sandro Hawke: "Re: status of SWRL FOL"
In reply to: Sandro Hawke: "Re: status of SWRL FOL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 02/17/05 EST