RE: XML syntax for SWRL

From: Boley, Harold ([email protected])
Date: 06/23/04

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: XML syntax for SWRL"

Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "XML syntax for SWRL"
Maybe in reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "XML syntax for SWRL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi Peter and All,

there seems to have been an oversight w.r.t. sorting/typing
SWRL variables according to the "I" vs. "D" distinction.
This can be added using RuleML's 'type' attribute. So, in
<http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/#5>,
the ruleml:var element

<ruleml:var>xsd:string</ruleml:var>

may be refined to either of these typed elements, following
the Abstract Syntax grammar:

<ruleml:var ruleml:type="I">xsd:string</ruleml:var>
<ruleml:var ruleml:type="D">xsd:string</ruleml:var>

Best,
Harold


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Peter F.
Patel-Schneider
Sent: June 23, 2004 12:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: XML syntax for SWRL


I was looking through the XML syntax for SWRL and it seems to me that the
distinction between I-variables and D-variables does not show up in this
syntax.  What happened?

peter

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: XML syntax for SWRL"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "XML syntax for SWRL"
Maybe in reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "XML syntax for SWRL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 06/23/04 EST