From: Sandro Hawke ([email protected])
Date: 02/12/04
> > So SWRL makes no claim to get it right, which is okay, but of course > > this means it's not really an "RDF Concrete Syntax", it's an "RDF-Like > > Concrete Syntax." Not so good. > > Well, this is probably the best that can be done. In what way is it better to use an "RDF-Like" syntax? That seems to me like the worst of both world -- all the syntactic beauty and convenience elegance of RDF/XML, plus all the standard-ness of the <blink> tag. -- sandro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 02/12/04 EST