From: Benjamin Grosof ([email protected])
Date: 12/09/03
% notes from JC telecon 12/09/03
% by Benjamin Grosof
participants:
Mike Dean
Benjamin Grosof
Harold Boley
Ian Horrocks
Sandro Hawke
Peter Patel-Schneider
Deborah McGuinness
agenda:
o general news from W3C -- wrt SWRL feedback and formation of Rules WG,
list discussion mode of www-rdf-rules tends to magnify any
disagreements/criticisms; so far there don't appear to be
major or widespread objections to SWRL
punchline: we need to keep proceeding, e.g., "with all deliberate speed"
o plan for NO TELECONS on 12/23 and 12/30
o next steps on SWRL
- might actively solicit feedback from DAML'ers
. wrt basic directions:
. wrt more specifics: tools and use cases would help
- tools and use cases needed
. e.g., use cases / examples work on rules for services
by Benjamin, Said, Massimo Paolucci
. e.g., tools work by
. Benjamin on SweetRules with Andi Eberhart, Said, and (past by) Boris
Motik;
expect new iteration of prototype in early 2004
. Jena
. JTP by Deborah
. Hoolet by Dimitri Sarkov, Sean Bechhofer
o datatype comparisons and arithmetic
Q by Mike: what's the best place to find specification of SCLP RuleML,
including the EBNF syntax?
A by Benj: see paper on my website: to appear in journal Electronic
Commerce Research and Applications "Representing E-Commerce Rules
Via Situated Courteous Logic Programs in RuleML";
also see the EBNF syntax specifications posted to JC in about May 2003
(discussion of naming issues wrt XML Schema;
Peter had some points)
discussion of sums, variable appearances within lists,
aggregations (e.g., totals, averages), cwm limitations in that regard
issue of closing off,
named individuals vs. other (e.g., existential) individuals
problem of indefiniteness interacting with aggregations
Benj: in database and logic programs literature, aggregations are well
understood to be closely related to closing off in manner of
negation as failure
Ian: we could push some of this into queries rather than premises;
extend existing systems in that fashion
Benj: yes; but often is useful to define aggregates in premises,
e.g., similar to materialized views in databases,
(e.g., a Morningstar 5* fund is one that is top 10 percentile over the
last 5 years);
can do this in manner of logic programs with NAF/aggregations
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Prof. Benjamin Grosof
Web Technologies for E-Commerce, Business Policies, E-Contracting, Rules,
XML, Agents, Semantic Web Services
MIT Sloan School of Management, Information Technology group
http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof or http://www.mit.edu/~bgrosof
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 12/09/03 EST