Re: feedback from owl-s and swsl

From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 12/04/03

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: updated document with possible directions for SWRL"

Previous message: Deborah L. McGuinness: "feedback from owl-s and swsl"
In reply to: Deborah L. McGuinness: "feedback from owl-s and swsl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> there is some input that we can get from both committees on rule use 
> case requirements, issues, etc.

Great!

> they asked where the best place was to provide input.

[email protected]

Thanks!

	Mike

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: updated document with possible directions for SWRL"
Previous message: Deborah L. McGuinness: "feedback from owl-s and swsl"
In reply to: Deborah L. McGuinness: "feedback from owl-s and swsl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 12/04/03 EST