Re: SWRL updates

• Previous message: Mike Dean: "SWRL updates"
• In reply to: Mike Dean: "SWRL updates"
• Next in thread: Harold Boley: "Re: SWRL updates"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mike,

I updated section 3 to be a little more detailed/precise and to be
more consistent with the latest S&AS.

Otherwise, looks good.

Ian


On November 14, Mike Dean writes:
> In the interest of closure, I made the following changes to
> [1]
> 
>   updated the namespaces in sections 5 and 6 to use swrl[x],
>   owl[x], and ruleml.  After some consideration, I also
>   decided to add the namespaces to the XML productions, for
>   clarity.
> 
>   updated the text at the beginning of section 5 as
>   suggested by Harold
> 
>   fixed several instances of non-well-formed XML in section
>   5, replacing for example
>   <owlx:class="&airport-ont;Airport" /> with <owlx:Class
>   owlx:name="&airport-ont;Airport" />
> 
>   renamed section 6 to RDF Concrete Syntax and included
>   links to both
>   the RDF Schema and OWL Ontology (for now, anyway)
> 
>   updated the title, authors, and date
> 
> Any complaints or suggestions?  Does anyone anticipate any
> more updates before we accept the current document on
> Tuesday?
> 
> 	Mike
> 
> [1] http://www.daml.org/rules/proposal/

• Next message: Harold Boley: "Re: SWRL updates"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "SWRL updates"
• In reply to: Mike Dean: "SWRL updates"
• Next in thread: Harold Boley: "Re: SWRL updates"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/14/03 EST