OWL Rules proposal

• Previous message: Harold Boley: "Next Update: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
• Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
• Reply: Mike Dean: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
• Reply: Mike Dean: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dear All,

Peter and I have extended our proposal [1] to include a concrete XML
syntax. This is an extension of the OWL Web Ontology Language XML
Presentation Syntax [2], the reason being that this saves us having to
re-invent XML syntax for OWL descriptions so that we can use them as
predicates in rules. It also has the benefit of allowing rules and
axioms to be freely mixed.

The proposal also includes a couple of examples. We will try to
extend these before the Tuesday telecon - which I should be able to
make if my travel goes to schedule.

Regards,

Ian and Peter

[1] http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~horrocks/DAML/Rules/

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-xmlsyntax/

• Next message: Ian Horrocks: "OWL Rules proposal"
• Previous message: Harold Boley: "Next Update: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
• Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
• Reply: Mike Dean: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
• Reply: Mike Dean: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 09/28/03 EST