From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 09/05/03
Thanks to Said (and Harold) for taking notes and allowing me to redistribute them. Mike ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: [email protected] Message-ID: <001f01c371b9$1e7728c0$6c7ba8c0@VALUEDGIF0G3H4> From: "Said Tabet" <[email protected]> To: "Mike Dean" <[email protected]> Cc: "Boley, Harold" <[email protected]> Subject: notes from today's telecon Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:17:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Status: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 Hi Mike, Here are our notes with the action items from today's telecon. Hopefully this will help putting together the telecon notes since you are traveling today: - A version of the Rules Lite concrete syntax will be used for OWL Rules and will be proposed for the 'to-be-named' Semantic Web rules language. - The new concrete syntax version will modify the current one (http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/1444.html) as follows. - Use only unary and binary predicates. Encapsulate the discussion/example of ternary and N-ary predicates into a "future work" section. - Use only prefix notation for predicates (uniformity, simplicity, ease of implementation, possible future N-ary extension). The infix and postfix notations are not needed. Give a DTD/Schema for the concrete unary+binary prefix syntax. - Add URIs to this concrete syntax using href and/or wid+widref attributes on the ind and _opr tags. Perhaps also make this compatible with OWL/RDF statement IDs. - Modify existing parsers (and generators?) for allowing this syntax to be used for rules interchange. Possible implementations: cwm, Jena2, Ian's-new-OWL-engine, Said's-Jess-adaptation, ... Best, Said and Harold ------- End of Forwarded Message
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 09/05/03 EST