From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 02/04/03
I think we want to include something like this, although it would probably be better as part of a larger Web Services or other application use case. OWL places some limitations on expressivity to retain tractability. A frequently cited limitation is "property chaining", the ability to express constraints among multiple properties. We can augment an OWL ontology with additional inference rules. Several examples: 2 siblings have the same father, i.e. sibling(S1, S2) father(S1, F) => father(S2, F) a Debtor is a Person whose (cumulative) liabilities exceed his (cumulative) assets Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 02/04/03 EST