From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 02/04/03
I think we want to include something like this, although it
would probably be better as part of a larger Web Services or
other application use case.
OWL places some limitations on expressivity to retain
tractability. A frequently cited limitation is "property
chaining", the ability to express constraints among
multiple properties. We can augment an OWL ontology with
additional inference rules.
Several examples:
2 siblings have the same father, i.e.
sibling(S1, S2)
father(S1, F)
=>
father(S2, F)
a Debtor is a Person whose (cumulative) liabilities
exceed his (cumulative) assets
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 02/04/03 EST