Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C

From: Frank van Harmelen ([email protected])
Date: 12/18/01

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
In reply to: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mike Dean wrote:
> 
> > With thanks to Peter and all the folks that did
> > all the detailed work to get this to happen,
> > I bring to your attention...
> >
> > "DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language
> 
> What a nice holiday present!  Thanks for the good news!
> 
> > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2001/12/

Item nr. 5 (the language spec, http://www.w3.org/2001/10/daml+oil.daml) is currently a broken link (the same URL with a .xml extension is available for "forbidden"...?)

Item nr. 6 points to http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-walkthru/daml+oil-ex.daml, but does weird things (tries to open a .xml file instead ?)

Frank.
   ----

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
In reply to: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST