From: Pat Hayes ([email protected])
Date: 12/07/01
>Pat Hayes wrote:
>[...]
>> >Er... it was your idea...
>[...]
>>
>> OK, Touche.
>>
>> There are two rather different things that denying (p or not p) could
>> mean. One (not so good) is to move from a 2-valued to a 3- or
>> more-valued logic. The other (better) is to move to a constructive or
>> intuitionistic logic. I should have checked which one you meant
>> before reacting, sorry.
>
>Rather than an apology,
>I'd prefer a clarification to joint-committee to say
>that you don't think I'm completely off my rocker.
Whoops, I thought I had Ccd it. Sor.....no, wrong strategy....
Pat hereby certifies that Dan Connolly is not completely off his rocker.
Pat
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax
[email protected]
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST