From: Pat Hayes ([email protected])
Date: 12/04/01
>From: Pat Hayes <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: querying DAML+OIL syntax >Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:56:39 -0600 > >> >From: Pat Hayes <[email protected]> >> >Subject: Re: querying DAML+OIL syntax >> >Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:44:07 -0600 > >[....] > >> I must be getting old, or something. I really do not follow you. Are >> you saying that A does NOT entail B?? > >The problem here is that everything in DAML+OIL is triples, even >the stuff that really should be syntax. All these triples end up in the >interpretations, thus preventing the appropriate entailments. OK, I have got this now. Sorry I was slow. But I'm not convinced that they *prevent* the entailments, if 'entailment' is defined properly. > > If we don't have any relationships in the model theory, how will we >> entail ANYTHING? > >There are lots of entailments, it is just that you end up with too few, >because the syntax triples pollute the interpretations. Right. But we ought to be able to just get round this by defining a semantic extension to RDF, ie a notion of DAML+OIL-entailment in RDF which treats the syntactic encoding appropriately. It won't look much like RDF entailment, to be sure, but I think it could be described in terms of operations on RDF triples; not all of them RDF-valid, of course, but one cannot expect miracles. The relevant notion of 'closure' would add all the permutations of syntactically ordered but semantically unordered things, for example. In this way DAML+OIL would be an extension to RDFS in the same kind of way that RDFS is an extension to RDF. This would imply that any DAML+OIL-savvy RDF engine would have to be able to recognize the triples that were to be treated specially, of course; but that is hardly news, right? I may still be missing something vital in your argument: if so, please say so. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax [email protected] http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST