Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 11/21/01

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "layering DAML+OIL on top of RDF model theory"
Previous message: Stefan Decker: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
In reply to: Stefan Decker: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Next in thread: Pat Hayes: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: Stefan Decker <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:45:54 -0800

> 
> Peter,
> 
> thanks for your answer!
> Another question:
> If I can represent the interpretation graph in RDF, then I can use your
> interpretation to derive an RDF representation for every XML document.
> 
> Is this correct?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>          Stefan

Again, let me answer a slightly different question:

Q: Can this approach be used to derive a model-theoretic meaning for every
   XML document? 

A: Yes, absolutely.  Even (especially) for XML documents that are not
   XML/RDF.

peter

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "layering DAML+OIL on top of RDF model theory"
Previous message: Stefan Decker: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
In reply to: Stefan Decker: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Next in thread: Pat Hayes: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST