Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 11/20/01

Next message: Stefan Decker: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Next in thread: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Reply: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
[...]
> 2/ parsetype, as this is not good XML.  (parsetype=literal is not needed,
>    in any case, here.)

What's wrong with rdf:parseYype="Literal"?

It's perfectly good XML. Please don't spread misinformation.

If you mean that you don't like it, please say so more plainly.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Next message: Stefan Decker: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Next in thread: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Reply: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST