From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 10/24/01
I vote for none of the ``above''.
The answer should be equivalent to a two-member set of pairs.
One such answer could be
{ < <patsCar> , <blue> > ,
< _:b , <red> > }
Another possible answer could be
?x = <patsCar>, ?y = { <blue> }
?x = <_:b>, ?y = { <red> }
This second version could allow for a more-natural representation of some
answers, at a certain price.
I am torn between these two. Formally, I like the simplicity of the
former. Pragmatically, I want the answer to reflect any ``nesting'' in the
query and thus like the second. (Yes, there is little possibility of
nesting in RDF.)
peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST