From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 10/24/01
I vote for none of the ``above''. The answer should be equivalent to a two-member set of pairs. One such answer could be { < <patsCar> , <blue> > , < _:b , <red> > } Another possible answer could be ?x = <patsCar>, ?y = { <blue> } ?x = <_:b>, ?y = { <red> } This second version could allow for a more-natural representation of some answers, at a certain price. I am torn between these two. Formally, I like the simplicity of the former. Pragmatically, I want the answer to reflect any ``nesting'' in the query and thus like the second. (Yes, there is little possibility of nesting in RDF.) peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST