From: Joseph Coffman ([email protected])
Date: 10/22/01
> > > >Dan- > Does this mean W3C people cannot participate in any open source >efforts?? I propose we simply consider DAML+OIL as if it was open >source. I don't see what IP we want to claim -- any tools developed >by any of us remain our own. The language is something I don't see >any of us owning/licensing. > Officially, by the way, DARPA's policy is to leave our PIs owning >their own IP, govt gets a perpetual, royalty free license (It's in >the contract your organization signed when they accepted the money). >Patents and etc. go back to your organization if requested, this is >Federal law as I recall. > In this case, I'm simply wondering what IP anyone thinks they want >to keep in this thing -- if we were talking about the tool kit or >etc, it would be different. > -JH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST