From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 10/09/01
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> From: Pat Hayes <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: datatypes and RDF Schema
> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:57:09 -0500
>
>
>>BTW, re. your recent rants about communication. This issue is being
>>discussed simultaneously both here and on RDF-core, and I'm sure it
>>would be extremely useful if the discussions could be integrated.
>>
>
> I do not believe that I can post to that mailing list. Can I?
You're welcome to join the RDF Core WG and post to the list.
I'm not sure what mechanisms/policies are in place in the
case you try to post to the RDF Core list without joining
the group.
> One important forcing function, and one that appears to be getting
> completely insufficient attention in the RDF Core WG, is
>
> What does XML/XML Schema do?
XML doesn't 'do' anything relevant.
Severl people in the WG are quite faimilar with
XML Schema. It doesn't answer the question either.
> PS: Does anyone know how to elevate this issue to joint RDF/XML/DAML+OIL
> consideration?
I don't know what that means.
> Is the Semantic Web Coordination Group the right place?
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST