From: Dan Brickley ([email protected])
Date: 07/09/01
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, pat hayes wrote:
> >pat hayes wrote:
> > >
> >[...]
> > > The coreWG has decided that RDF describes containers rather
> > > than, as it were, implementing them, so there is no way to say that
> > > an RDF container has a limited number of items.
> >
> >Really? When/where? pointer?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-formalmodel
>
> From which it seems to follow that any container description can be partial, eg
>
> <rdf:Bag>
> <rdf:_1>1</rdf:_1>
> <rdf:_2>2</rdf:_2>
> </rdf:Bag>
>
> may be a complete description of a bag with two members OR a partial
> description of a bag with three or more members.
>
> If I have this wrong, please correct my misunderstanding.
Sounds ok so far. But you say...
> > > than, as it were, implementing them, so there is no way to say that
> > > an RDF container has a limited number of items.
...and I'm puzzled. Maybe I took 'no way to say' in a stronger sense
than intended; additional vocabulary (not currently provided by RDF
Core) would let you do just this, unless I'm missing something...
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:_1>1</rdf:_1>
<rdf:_2>2</rdf:_2>
<util:bagsize>7</util:bagsize> <!-- or whatever, eg util:last... -->
</rdf:Bag>
Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST