Re: A comment on DAML FAQ

From: Deborah Mcguinness ([email protected])
Date: 06/05/01

Good points pat.

In followup to the discussion in today's meeting the following two
additional sources of information on how to use daml-like systems follow:

The first is how to use a kl-one-like system  (or how to use a simple dl

Ronald J. Brachman, Alex Borgida, Deborah L. McGuinness, Peter F.
Patel-Schneider, and Lori Alperin Resnick. ``Living with CLASSIC: When
and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language.'' In Principles of Semantic
Networks: Explorations in the representation of knowledge, ed. John Sowa.
San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, pages 401--456.

I just put up an abstract page for it that points to the postscript
version peter has up:

Also, we used the examples in this paper to provide an ontology tutorial
aimed more at protege than any other system.    one could think of this
as how to build a first ontology using a language with at least medium
level expressive power.

Natalya Fridman Noy and Deborah L. McGuinness. ``Ontology Development
101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology''. Stanford Knowledge
Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical
Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, March 2001.

abstract (with pointers) is up at:


pat hayes wrote:

> Q:       Do I need a Ph.D. in Artificial Intelligence to use DAML?
> A:
>         No. The designers of DAML are seeking to merge experience
> gained from their collective work in Knowledge
>         Representation and other AI fields, the World Wide Web,
> software development, and military and commercial
>         applications to provide a language and tools that balance
> usability and power.
> That answer is a bit of a cop-out. The fact is that DAML in its
> present form is *not* easy to learn or to follow. Many of its
> constructs are fairly abstruse (I'm thinking in particular of the
> min/maxCardinalityQ). The restriction/onProperty/toClass way of
> talking is not given by God to all right-thinking people, but is an
> idiosyncratic perspective limited to those familiar with the, er,
> classical class languages. It still makes my head hurt. So I think
> the honest answer might be more like "No, but it sure would help, and
> you had better know a bit about object-oriented class-inheritance
> languages."
> But more seriously, surely the first FAQ should be something like
> "what use is DAML to me?" or "What should I use DAML for?" or some
> such. The FAQ right now doesnt seem to actually say what DAML really
> is in any sharp sense. For example, we might point out that the
> 'class/property' way of talking has been widely used in Krep and is
> closely linked to things like data modelling languages, just to kind
> of locate this whole enterprise in some kind of intellectual space.
> Before asking why not use XML, something should explain the
> relationships of DAML to RDF(S) and XML.
> Pat
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                    (850)434 8903   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St.                    (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola,  FL 32501                    (850)202 4440   fax
> [email protected]

 Deborah L. McGuinness
 Knowledge Systems Laboratory
 Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241
 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020
 email: [email protected]
 (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)
801 705 0941

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST