Re: rule proto-proposal

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 05/31/01

• Next message: Stefan Decker: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> pat hayes wrote:
[...]
> > A term is either a class name, a
> > datatype or a variable.
> 
> Why distinguish those in the syntax?
> It seems necessary and sufficient to use URI constant
> symbols for all of them.

oops... I didn't mean to lump variables in there.

I just meant that class names and datatypes
are subsumed by URI constant symbols.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

• Next message: Stefan Decker: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: rule proto-proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST