Re: revised thinking on RDF reification, imports

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 05/15/01

Next message: Dan Connolly: "enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "revised thinking on RDF reification, imports"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "revised thinking on RDF reification, imports"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> At that time (Aug 2000) I decided that the rdf:subject
> of an rdf:Statement was a URI (ala: the subject is a person).

ooop; typo. That should read: (ala: the subject is a word).


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Next message: Dan Connolly: "enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "revised thinking on RDF reification, imports"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "revised thinking on RDF reification, imports"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST