Re: DAML+OIL Light

From: Frank van Harmelen ([email protected])
Date: 04/18/01

Jim Hendler wrote:
> Seems to me that all this is requesting is something that produces a
> document that says "A good subset of DAML+OIL for many applications
> is..." and explaining why.  Doesn't seem to me it needs a "name" and
> status, am I missing something?

This was indeed what the discussion yesterday was converging towards!


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST