From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 03/22/01
I agree with Pat's proposal (below) to change the documentation to eliminate ``abstract''. There are no occurences of concrete within the current files, except in a commented-out paragraph. > pat hayes wrote: > [...] > > abstract class --> class (or --> DAML class , if the point needs > > emphasising) > > abstract object --> object > > abstract domain --> class domain (or --> DAML class domain) > > concrete class --> datatype (or --> xmls datatype) > > concrete object --> datatype value The previous version of the documentation heavily used the term ``instance'' for objects. I changed them to object (mostly abstract object). I'm not recommending changing back to instance. (This comment is mostly here as a vote to not change back.) peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST