From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 03/08/01
Something I forgot to suggest yesterday ... Last week we agreed to add a list of contributors to the software files (daml+oil.daml, daml+oil-ex.daml, daml+oil-ex-dt.xsd, etc.) included in the DAML+OIL release. Should we use Dublin Core [1] for the .daml files? This would provide the information in a more usable form, and might be useful for other purposes as well. A strawman set of statements for inclusion in daml+oil.daml (with an incomplete list of contributors) is given below. DC experts, feel free to offer corrections or other advice. In particular, I couldn't readily find a reference on how to encode element qualifiers in RDF. Thanks! Mike [1] http://www.dublincore.org <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> <rdf:Description about=""> <dc:title>DAML+OIL (March 2001) namespace</dc:title> <dc:creator>Joint US/EU ad hoc Agent Markup Language Committee</dc:creator> <dc:description>This is the specification for the DARPA Agent Markup Language (DAML), represented in Resource Description Framework (RDF).</dc:description> <dc:publisher>Joint US/EU ad hoc Agent Markup Language Committee</dc:publisher> <dc:contributor>Dan Connolly</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Frank van Harmelen</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Ian Horrocks</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Deb McGuinness</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Peter Patel-Schneider</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Lynn Andrea Stein</dc:contributor> ... <dc:date>2001-03-14</dc:date> <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type> <dc:format>text/xml</dc:format> <dc:identifier rdf:resource="http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil"/> <dc:language>en</dc:language> <dc:relation rdf:resource="reference.html"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST