one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider ([email protected])
Date: 02/22/01

• Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "summary of status with respect to datatypes"
• Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Reply: Jeff Heflin: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi:

I would like for one the points that are brought up at the RDF meeting
next week to be that XML namespaces can be used in resource names.  It is
exceedingly silly to state a bunch of namespace definitions only to have to
revert to the long name in most places.

peter

• Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "summary of status with respect to datatypes"
• Next in thread: Dan Connolly: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Reply: Jeff Heflin: "Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST