Re: about vs. ID

From: Lynn Andrea Stein ([email protected])
Date: 01/23/01

• Next message: Lynn Andrea Stein: "Re: Joint Committee telecon today"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: Joint Committee telecon today"
• In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: about vs. ID"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Late, but let me chime in on this one anyway:

The original about vs. ID distinction has been well covered in earlier
responses, but one additional twist bears mentioning.  Pat talked a
while ago about names that take meaning from their communities of use,
becoming "proper" names.  I think that ID= establishes an intent to use
this as such.  I don't think we necessarily want to maintain the
convention, but I do think that we should recognize that it's not just
the formal semantics, but also the usage pragmatics, that are affected.

Lynn

• Next message: Lynn Andrea Stein: "Re: Joint Committee telecon today"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: Joint Committee telecon today"
• In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: about vs. ID"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST