From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 12/21/00
Ian Horrocks wrote:
>
> I thought we had agreed on daml+oil, not daml+ont.
Oops... yes, we did; at least for the title:
RESOLVED: "DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Oil"
for the title of the next release; clear acknowledgement of all
contributors.
-- http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2000-12-08-irc.txt
(... Semantic Web is what we meant, I think ;-)
> I has assumed the names would be:
>
> daml+oil.daml
> daml+oil-ex.daml
Fine by me.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:[email protected]
(put return phone number in from/subject)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST