From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 12/20/00
Mike Dean wrote:
>
> Let's plan to use entries under
>
> http://www.daml.org/2000/12/
>
> with
>
> daml+ont.daml for the namespace
Please don't include the extension in the namespace name. Just use:
http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+ont#
As to why, see
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
Other than that, I agree.
> daml+ont-index.html for a dispatch page (HTML references
> to the release should generally point here)
>
> daml-ex.daml, etc.
>
> This approach has the following advantages
>
> short URI for namespace
>
> keeps all files together
>
> consistency with the daml-ont release
>
> avoids the content negotiation problem with daml-ont.daml
> that I introduced by using daml-ont.html as the dispatch
> page
yup.
> allows for the possibility of other files also being under
> 2000/12/
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mike
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:[email protected]
(put return phone number in from/subject)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST