Re: DAML and 'terminology'

From: Mike Dean ([email protected])
Date: 08/30/01

• Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML bug"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML and 'terminology'"
• Maybe in reply to: mike hogarth: "DAML and 'terminology'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Is there such a thing as sameInstanceAs
> 
> or is the team sameIndividualAs the correct DAML+OIL term?

daml:sameIndividualAs is the correct term.  My mistake.

	Mike

• Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML bug"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: DAML and 'terminology'"
• Maybe in reply to: mike hogarth: "DAML and 'terminology'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/03/02 EST